Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing all 8 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Edouard Karemera (“Karemera et al.”)

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Genocidal Rape Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Sexual Violence as Genocide Superior Responsibility

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-98-44
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Edouard Karemera
    Charges
    - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction as genocide. -Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE III) and Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the rapes and sexual violence committed against Tutsi women and girls committed by Interahamwe. (As for genocide and JCE III, the sexual violence committed after 11 April 1994; as for genocide and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe. As for crimes against humanity and JCE III, the sexual violence committed in Ruhengeri prefecture, Kigali-ville prefecture, Butare prefecture, Kibuye prefecture and Gitarama prefecture; as for crimes against humanity and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Karemera was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 February 2012 of:- Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction as genocide-Rape as a crime against humanity
    sentencing
    Karemera received a sentence of life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 29 September 2014 reversed the Trial Chamber’s finding that Karemera bore superior responsibility over the Kigali and/or Gisenyi Interahamwe in relation to the rapes and sexual assaults of Tutsi women committed outside Kigali from April to June 1994. The other sexual violence convictions by the Trial Chamber remained standing.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-44

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Matthieu Ngirumpatse (“Karemera et al.”)

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Superior Responsibility Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Sexual Violence as Genocide

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-98-44
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Matthieu Ngirumpatse
    Charges
    - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction as genocide. -Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE III) and Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the rapes and sexual violence committed against Tutsi women and girls committed by Interahamwe. (As for genocide and JCE III, the sexual violence committed after 11 April 1994; as for genocide and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe. As for crimes against humanity and JCE III, the sexual violence committed in Ruhengeri prefecture,Kigali-ville prefecture, Butare prefecture, Kibuye prefecture and Gitarama prefecture; as for crimes against humanity and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Ngirumpatse was found guilty by the Trial Chamber (on 2 February 2012) of: - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction as genocide and rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE III) and Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the rapes and sexual violence committed against Tutsi women and girls committed by Interahamwe. As for genocide and JCE III, the sexual violence committed after 11 April 1994; as for genocide and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe. As for crimes against humanity and JCE III, the sexual violence committed in Ruhengeri prefecture, Kigali-ville prefecture, Butare prefecture, Kibuye prefecture and Gitarama prefecture; as for crimes against humanity and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe.
    sentencing
    Ngirumpatse received a sentence of life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 29 September 2014 reversed the Trial Chamber’s finding that Ngirumpatse bore superior responsibility over the Kigali and/or Gisenyi Interahamwe in relation to the rapes and sexual assaults of Tutsi women committed outside Kigali from April to June 1994. The other sexual violence convictions by the Trial Chamber remain standing.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-44

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Pauline Nyiramasuhuko (Nyiramasuhuko et al."Butare")

    Year
    2015
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Female Perpetrators of Sexual Violence Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions Sentencing and Reparations
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Forced Nudity Insufficient Evidence Superior Responsibility Fair Trial Undue Delay

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-98-42
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Pauline Nyiramasuhuko
    Charges
    - Rape as a crime against humanity.-Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for ordering Interahamwe under her effective control to rape Tutsi women at the Butare prefecture office.- Sexual violence as genocide -Persecution as a crime against humanity -Violence to life, health and physical or mental well-being as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime -Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Articles 6(1) (direct responsibility) and 6(3) (command responsibility).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Nyiramasuhuko was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 24 June 2011 of: - Rape as a crime against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime. Nyiramasuhuko was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of:- Sexual violence as genocide, persecution as a crime against humanity and violence to life, health and physical or mental well-being as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime, and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity due to insufficient notice of the Prosecutor’s intention to pursue these sexual violence crimes. - Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity due to insufficient notice of the Prosecutor’s intention to pursue these sexual violence crimes and that it adduced insufficient evidence to prove that Nyiramasuhuko forced her victims to undress completely before forcing them into vehicles and taking them to their deaths.
    sentencing
    Nyiramasuhuko received a sentence of life imprisonment. However, her sentence was reduced to 47 years’ imprisonment, in particular due to a violation of the accused’s right to be tried without undue delay.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 14 December 2015, the Appeals Chamber upheld the findings in respect of the sexual violence conviction (see above). Her sentence was reduced to 47 years’ imprisonment, in particular due to a violation of the accused’s right to be tried without undue delay.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-42

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Hazim Delic (Mucic et al."Celebici Camp")

    Year
    2003
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Akayesu Torture Superior Responsibility Camp Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/676/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Hazim Delic
    Charges
    - Torture as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (committing) for the rape of Grozdana Cecez and for multiple rapes of Milojka Antic (Witness A). - Other sexual violence charges charged under Article 7(3)
    Trial chamber verdict
    Delic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 16 November 1998 of: - Torture as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime Delic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - All the other sexual violence charges for which he was charged under Article 7(3) as the Prosecution failed to prove that Delic had superior responsibility over Celebici prison-camp, i.e. for the multiple rapes of Grozdana Cecez and Milojka Antic (i.e. cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime); for placing a burning fuse cord around the genital areas of two detainees (i.e. willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime); and for forcing detainees to commit fellatio on each other (i.e. inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime).
    sentencing
    Delic was sentenced to 18 years of imprisonment on 8 April 2003.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 20 February 2001 stated that “multiple criminal convictions entered under different statutory provisions but based on the same conduct are permissible only if each statutory provision involved has a materially distinct element not contained in the other.” For this reason, it reversed the Trial Chamber’s conviction for torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime, but upheld the torture as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime conviction for the rape of Grozdana Cecez and for multiple rapes of Milojka Antic (Witness A).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-96-21

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Nebojsa Pavkovic (“Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.”)

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Persecution on Sexual Grounds Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Superior Responsibility Physical Integrity Consent Foreseeable Consequence Common Objective of JCE Kosovo Albanian Civilians Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Nebojsa Pavkovic
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE III) for sexual assaults committed in Decani/Deçan and in Cirez/Qirez in the municipality of Srbica/Skenderaj by the VJ and MUP forces executing his orders. - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Pavkovic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2009 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity Pavkovic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity
    sentencing
    Pavkovic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 22 years’ imprisonment on 23 January 2014.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber, with Judge Liu and Judge Tuzmukhamedov dissenting, subsequently found that the Trial Chamber incorrectly held Pavkovic not guilty for committing through his participation in a JCE III persecution, through sexual assaults, as a crime against humanity in Priština/Prishtina, but declined, Judge Ramaroson dissenting, to enter new convictions against him in this regard (with reference to Article 25(2) of the ICTY Statute and the Jelisic Appeal Judgement, para. 73 (discretion in choice of remedy lies with the Chamber)).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Zdravko Mucic (Mucic et al. "Celebici Camp")

    Year
    2003
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Genitalia Forced Oral Sex Superior Responsibility

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/676/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Zdravko Mucic
    Charges
    - Torture as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(3) (command responsibility) for the multiple rapes of Grozdana Cecez and Milojka Antic (Witness A). - Willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(3) (command responsibility) for the serious pain and injury inflicted upon detainee Vukašin Mrkajic when Esad Landzo placed a burning fuse cord against Vukašin Mrkajic’s bare skin in the genital area. - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(3) (command responsibility) for when Esad Landzo forced two detainees, Vaso Dorcic and his brother Veseljko Dorcic, to commit fellatio on each other.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Mucic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 16 November 1998 of: - Torture as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime
    sentencing
    Mucic was sentenced to 9 years of imprisonment on 8 April 2003.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 20 February 2001 stated that “multiple criminal convictions entered under different statutory provisions but based on the same conduct are permissible only if each statutory provision involved has a materially distinct element not contained in the other.” For this reason, it reversed the Trial Chamber’s conviction for torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime, but upheld the torture as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime conviction for the multiple rapes of Grozdana Cecez and Milojka Antic (Witness A). In addition, the Appeals Chamber reversed the Trial Chamber’s conviction for cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime, but upheld the willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime conviction for the serious pain and injury inflicted upon detainee Vukasin Mrkajic when Esad Landzo placed a burning fuse cord against Vukasin Mrkajic’s bare skin in the genital area. Finally, The Appeals Chamber reversed the cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime, but upheld the inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime conviction for when Esad Landzo forced two detainees, Vaso Dorcic and his brother Veseljko Dorcic, to commit fellatio on each other.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-96-21

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    SCSL - Charles Ghankay Taylor

    Year
    2013
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution Modes of Liability
    Country
    Sierra Leone
    Keywords
    Forced Marriage Aiding and Abetting Superior Responsibility Conjugal Slavery AFRC RUF

    Reference link
    http://www.rscsl.org/Taylor.html
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)
    Name of accused
    Charles Ghankay Taylor
    Charges
    Taylor faced an eleven count indictment, including; - crimes against humanity of rape and sexual slavery - war crime of outrages upon personal dignity. -war crime of committing acts of terror, carried out by, inter alia, sexual violence. He was not accused of carrying out these crimes himself; rather, he was charged with assisting and encouraging, acting in concert with, directing, controlling and/or being the superior of the Revolutionary United Front (RUF), the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC), the joint RUF-AFRC junta and/or Liberian fighters.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 26 April 2012 the Trial Chamber found Taylor guilty on all eleven counts charged, including the charges that incorporated sexual violence crimes, as an aider and abettor of crimes committed by rebel forces in Sierra Leone.
    sentencing
    Taylor was sentenced to 50 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber, on 26 September 2013, upheld Taylor’s conviction and 50 years’ sentence.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    SCSL-03-01

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    US Military Commission in Manila - General Tomoyuki Yamashita

    Year
    1945
    Issues
    Modes of Liability
    Country
    Japan
    Keywords
    Superior Responsibility Sexual Violence World War II

    Reference link
    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/327/1/
    Type of mechanism
    Military Commission
    Name of mechanism
    US Military Commission in Manila
    Name of accused
    Tomoyuki Yamashita
    Charges
    He was charged with several war crimes, including rape, under command responsibility (as a commander he was held responsible for his subordinates), for the rape of hundreds of Filipino women. It was never alleged that he had personally committed the rapes.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 7 December 1945, Yamashita was found guilty. The commission considered rape a war crime.
    sentencing
    Sentenced to death by hanging.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    His conviction was upheld by the US Supreme Court in 1946.
    Status
    2715

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).